AI code editor with agents, cloud agents and code review, offered with a free Hobby tier and paid plans.
Free stops at: Limited Agent requests
Free · paid from $20/mo US · checked Sep 29
Explainer · updated Oct 10, 2026
Cursor is an AI-powered code editor from Anysphere, Inc. built around coding agents that edit code, run in the cloud and review pull requests. It has a free Hobby plan and paid plans from $20/mo.
Cursor is an AI-powered code editor built around coding agents. The agents can edit code, run on cloud computers and review pull requests. The company behind it is Anysphere, Inc., and the product lives at cursor.com. You give it natural-language prompts, point it at your codebase and repositories, and attach docs or files for context. In return you get code edits shown as diffs, pull requests, plans with task breakdowns and code review comments. An account is required, so you sign in before using it.
You download the desktop app (the download page shows macOS), sign in and open your project folder. You can pick a model or leave Auto selected. Then you open the agent, describe the change, attach relevant files and review the proposed plan before accepting the diff. The same agent is also reachable from the CLI, Slack and GitHub. Cursor lists models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, SpaceXAI and Cursor itself, and the docs mention JetBrains and Xcode integrations. Project conventions go into Cursor rules or an AGENTS.md file, and tool access comes through MCP servers.
Hobby is free, needs no credit card and includes limited Agent requests. Individual (Pro) starts at $20/mo and adds extended Agent limits, frontier models, cloud agents, and MCPs, skills and hooks. Pro+ and Ultra are higher Individual tiers, but their prices were not shown in the pages we checked. Teams starts at $40/user/mo and adds centralized billing, Bugbot, team-wide privacy mode and SAML/OIDC SSO. Enterprise pricing is custom. Prices exclude taxes, and usage beyond the included amount is billed on demand in arrears. Pricing was checked on 2026-09-29. The full plan table is on the Cursor pricing page.
Cursor lists professional developers, engineering teams and enterprises that need admin controls as its best fit. Individual developers can start free on Hobby and move to Individual at $20/mo when they need cloud agents or more agent usage. Teams that review many pull requests may value Bugbot, which is included on Teams. For the terminal alternatives, read what Claude Code is and what OpenAI Codex is, or jump to Claude Code vs Cursor and Replit vs Cursor.
Our profile lists GitHub Copilot, Windsurf Editor, Replit and Lovable as alternatives to consider. We have not documented a head-to-head comparison for each, so check the individual profiles for pricing, platforms and limits before switching. Cursor itself sells subscriptions only through cursor.com, not through resellers. We do have Cursor vs GitHub Copilot and Cursor vs Windsurf; the Cursor alternatives page and the AI coding tools guide cover the rest.
AI code editor with agents, cloud agents and code review, offered with a free Hobby tier and paid plans.
Free stops at: Limited Agent requests
Free · paid from $20/mo US · checked Sep 29
Yes, the Hobby plan is free with no credit card required. It includes limited Agent requests and access to Composer. Paid Individual plans start at $20/mo.
Individual is listed from $20/mo and Teams from $40/user/mo. Enterprise pricing is custom. Prices exclude taxes.
On-demand usage lets you keep using models past the included amount. It is billed in arrears, so your monthly cost can rise above the plan price.
Not with privacy mode on. Cursor states that code data is not used for training by Cursor or its model providers in that case. Team-wide privacy mode is listed on Teams.
No. Subscriptions are sold only through cursor.com.
We have not run a head-to-head test, so we do not rank them. Cursor is a standalone editor with cloud agents and Bugbot PR review, a free Hobby plan and Individual from $20/mo; compare that against the GitHub Copilot profile's plans and platforms.
compare>