Head-to-head · profiles checked Sep 29, 2026

Augment Code vs Cursor in 2026: flat team price or free editor start

Pick Cursor to start free in an editor and Augment Code for a flat team price. Both start at $20/month: Cursor Individual (Pro), and Augment Standard, which is flat for up to 50 seats and includes $20 of usage. Cursor also has a free Hobby plan and Teams at $40/user/month.

Augment Code lists no free plan. Both bill extra once included usage runs out.

Starting priceStandard $20/mo (flat, up to 50 seats) · Individual (Pro) $20/moAugment Code · Cursor
Free tierNo · Yes (Hobby)Augment Code · Cursor
Plans documented3 · 5Augment Code · Cursor
PlatformsIDE extensions, CLI, cloud agents, MCP · Desktop app, CLI, Slack, GitHubAugment Code · Cursor

We based this comparison on our Augment Code profile and our Cursor profile, both verified 2026-09-29 from official vendor pages; it uses no third-party benchmarks and no vendor paid for placement.

Is Augment Code better than Cursor? The short answer

Cursor is the easier one to try: it has a free Hobby plan, a desktop editor, a CLI and Slack and GitHub surfaces, and Individual starts at $20/mo. Augment Code lists no free plan, but its Standard plan is a flat $20/month for up to 50 seats with $20 of usage included, plus a Context Engine, an Auggie CLI and SOC 2 Type II. Both bill extra once included usage runs out. Small teams that want one flat price should look at Augment Code; people who want to start free in an editor should look at Cursor.

Based on our Augment Code profile verified 2026-09-29 and Cursor profile verified 2026-09-29, both built from official vendor pages; no benchmark was run.

Augment Code and Cursor, as their sites look today

Our own captures of each vendor's public pages. Click a frame for the full-size image.

Augment Code homepage — screenshot of the coding AI tool, Oct 1, 2026
Augment Code homepage. augmentcode.com, captured Oct 1, 2026
Cursor homepage — screenshot of the coding AI tool, Oct 1, 2026
Cursor homepage. cursor.com, captured Oct 1, 2026
Augment Code pricing page with plans and prices — screenshot of the coding AI tool, Oct 1, 2026
Augment Code plans and prices. augmentcode.com, captured Oct 1, 2026
Cursor pricing page with plans and prices — screenshot of the coding AI tool, Oct 1, 2026
Cursor plans and prices. cursor.com, captured Oct 1, 2026

Augment Code or Cursor: which to use, by task

If you only want the answer, this is the table. Everything below is the evidence from the two documented profiles.

Side-by-side comparison
You want toUseWhy
Try an AI coding agent for freeCursorCursor Hobby is free with limited Agent requests; Augment Code lists no free plan
Write and refactor code in a codebaseEitherBoth list a coding agent that edits code across files from a prompt
Give an agent context about a large repositoryAugment CodeAugment lists a Context Engine that indexes the codebase and is available through MCP
Run agents in the cloud while your laptop is offCursorCursor lists cloud agents on Individual and above; Augment lists cloud agents as a surface without plan detail
Review pull requests automaticallyEitherAugment has code review automation for GitHub; Cursor has Bugbot, included on Teams and usage-billed on Individual
Work from the terminal or in scriptsEitherAugment has the Auggie CLI; Cursor lists a CLI
Work inside VS Code or JetBrainsAugment CodeAugment lists IDE extensions for VS Code and JetBrains; Cursor is its own desktop editor, with JetBrains and Xcode listed in docs
Delegate work from SlackCursorCursor lists Slack as a surface; Augment's profile lists none
Pay one flat price for a teamAugment CodeAugment Standard and Business are flat for up to 50 seats; Cursor Teams is priced per user
Connect Jira, Linear or Notion for contextAugment CodeAugment documents MCP and native tools for these; Cursor lists MCP servers without naming them

Who should pick which

Augment Code suits teams wanting one flat price, Cursor suits people starting free in an editor Which one? Pick Augment Code ifFlat price, up to 50 seatsContext Engine, MCP and SDKVS Code and JetBrains, SOC 2Pick Cursor ifFree Hobby plan to startDesktop app, CLI, Slack, GitHubCloud agents and Bugbot reviewsStandard $20/mo · free tier: No Individual (Pro) from $20/mo free tier: Yes (Hobby) Augment Code vs Cursor in 2026: flat team price or free editor start
Pick Augment Code for a flat team price, Cursor to start free in an editor

Pick Augment Code if

  • You want one flat plan price for a team of up to 50 seats (Standard $20/month, Business $100/month)
  • You want a Context Engine that indexes your codebase and is also available through MCP
  • You want IDE extensions for VS Code and JetBrains plus the Auggie CLI
  • Your security review asks for SOC 2 Type II and paid plans that exclude AI training

Pick Cursor if

  • You want to start on a free plan with no credit card (Hobby, limited Agent requests)
  • You want a desktop editor plus a CLI, Slack and GitHub in one product
  • You want cloud agents and Bugbot pull request review on Individual or Teams
  • You need Teams features such as team-wide privacy mode and SAML/OIDC SSO at $40/user/mo

What Augment Code does better, and what Cursor does better

Augment Code
  • Flat plan price that covers up to 50 seats, with usage pooled across the team
  • Context Engine that indexes the codebase, also offered through an MCP server and SDK
  • IDE extensions for VS Code and JetBrains alongside the Auggie CLI
  • SOC 2 Type II listed, with usage analytics
Cursor
  • Free Hobby plan with no credit card required
  • Desktop app, CLI, Slack and GitHub surfaces
  • Cloud agents and automations running in parallel
  • Rules, skills, subagents, hooks, MCP and plugins for customization

Augment Code vs Cursor pricing: plans and free tiers

Side-by-side comparison
PlanToolPriceLimits
Augment StandardAugment Code$20/mo, flat for up to 50 seats$20 of usage included monthly; 50 concurrent sessions
Augment BusinessAugment Code$100/mo, flat for up to 50 seats$100 of usage included monthly; 50 concurrent sessions
Augment EnterpriseAugment CodeCustom (sales)Custom usage and top-ups; unlimited users
Cursor HobbyCursorFreeLimited Agent requests
Cursor Individual (Pro)Cursor$20/moExtended limits on Agent; usage beyond included amount billed on demand
Cursor Individual (Pro+ / Ultra)CursorNot statedPro+ recommended for daily agent users, Ultra for power users
Cursor Teams (Standard / Premium)Cursor$40/user/moIncluded usage plus on-demand billing
Cursor EnterpriseCursorCustom (sales)Pooled usage

USD as published on each vendor's pricing page, checked Sep 29, 2026. Augment Code pricing in full · Cursor pricing in full

Usage limits: what the vendors state

Side-by-side comparison
Augment CodeCursor
Messages / rate limitsStandard: $20 of usage per month; Business: $100 per month; 50 concurrent sessions outside EnterpriseHobby: limited Agent requests; Individual: extended limits on Agent, then on-demand billing
Context / file sizeNot statedNot stated
Seats / teamUp to 50 seats on Standard and Business; Enterprise has unlimited usersTeams is per user at $40/user/month; Enterprise has pooled usage

Feature comparison

Side-by-side comparison
FeatureAugment CodeCursor
Coding agentYesYes
Free planNoYes (Hobby)
Cloud agentsListed as a surfaceYes (Individual and above)
Code reviewYes (GitHub pull requests)Yes (Bugbot)
MCPYes, plus native tools and a Context Engine MCPYes, with skills and hooks
CLIYes (Auggie CLI)Yes
IDE supportVS Code and JetBrains extensionsOwn desktop app; JetBrains and Xcode listed in docs
Usage analyticsYesNot stated
Mobile appsNot statedNot stated

Privacy and data training

Side-by-side comparison
Augment CodeCursor
Training on your dataPaid plans exclude AI training under the Commercial Terms of ServiceNot used for training unless flagged for security review, reported as Feedback or agreed to; with privacy mode on, not used by Cursor or model providers
RetentionNot statedNot stated
Business controlsSOC 2 Type II, access controls, audit trails (Enterprise); Enterprise adds CMEK, data residency, SIEM and SSOTeam-wide privacy mode and SAML/OIDC SSO on Teams; audit logs on Enterprise

Taken from each vendor's published policy pages at the time of our check. Policies change; the source links are at the bottom.

Switching between Augment Code and Cursor: what carries over

Augment Code → CursorCarries over
  • Natural-language task prompts and the habit of reviewing diffs
  • MCP connections to your own tools
  • Pull request review on GitHub
You lose
  • Context Engine and its MCP server and SDK
  • Flat plan price for up to 50 seats
  • VS Code and JetBrains extensions, since Cursor is its own desktop app
Cursor → Augment CodeCarries over
  • Natural-language task prompts
  • MCP connections to your own tools
  • Terminal workflows through a CLI
You lose
  • Free Hobby plan
  • Slack surface and Bugbot
  • Pull request review beyond GitHub; Augment's docs excerpt mentions GitHub only

Pros and cons

Augment Code
  • Flat plan price covers up to 50 seats
  • SOC 2 Type II listed
  • No AI training stated on paid plans
  • No free plan listed
  • Usage beyond the included amount needs top-ups
  • Standard and Business lack SSO and CMEK
Cursor
  • Free Hobby plan with no credit card required
  • Team SSO and privacy mode on Teams
  • On-demand usage once included usage runs out
  • Free plan has limited Agent requests
  • Usage beyond the included amount is billed extra
  • Prices exclude taxes

The two tools

Open the live comparison table

Augment Code or Cursor: how to choose

  • Want to try an agent without paying: choose Cursor, since Augment Code lists no free plan
  • Want one flat price for up to 50 seats: choose Augment Code
  • Need a Context Engine exposed through MCP and an SDK: choose Augment Code
  • Want Slack and a standalone desktop editor: choose Cursor
  • Need SSO on a team plan: Cursor Teams lists SAML/OIDC SSO; Augment needs Enterprise
  • Cost matters most: compare included usage, since both bill extra beyond it and Augment adds a 40% service fee on LLM usage

Frequently asked questions

Is Augment Code cheaper than Cursor?

The entry prices match: Augment Code Standard and Cursor Individual (Pro) both start at $20/month. Augment's price is flat for up to 50 seats, while Cursor Teams is $40/user/month. Both charge extra beyond included usage, and Augment adds a 40% service fee on LLM usage, so total cost depends on how much you use.

Does Augment Code have a free plan like Cursor?

No. Augment Code lists no free plan and its trial terms were not captured, so you pay to evaluate it. Cursor's Hobby plan is free with no credit card required, but it has limited Agent requests.

Do Augment Code and Cursor train on my code?

Augment says paid plans exclude AI training on your data under its Commercial Terms. Cursor says code data is not used for training by Cursor or its model providers with privacy mode on. Retention periods are not stated for either tool, so check the policies before sharing sensitive code.

Which one is better for a team, Augment Code or Cursor?

Both have team options. Augment Code Standard and Business are flat plans for up to 50 seats with pooled usage, while Cursor Teams is $40/user/month with team-wide privacy mode and SAML/OIDC SSO. Augment's Standard and Business plans lack SSO and CMEK per its comparison table; its Enterprise plan adds them.

Sources

Only official vendor pages. No third-party benchmarks, forum threads or press were used. How we review.