n8n vs Make in 2026: which automation platform fits your team
Pick n8n if you have technical staff, want to self-host, or want billing per workflow execution with unlimited users and workflows. Pick Make for a no-code builder, a free plan with no time limit and paid plans from $9/month for 10k credits. n8n's cloud Starter is listed at 20€/mo in EUR only, and n8n Community Edition is free to self-host.
Starting priceStarter 20€/mo (EUR only) · Core $9/mon8n · Make
Free tierSelf-hosted Community Edition; cloud trial · Free plan, 1,000 credits/mon8n · Make
Plans documented5 · 5n8n · Make
Integrations1000+ (Community Edition listing) · 3,000+ appsn8n · Make
We based this comparison on our verified profiles of n8n (checked 2026-10-01) and Make (checked 2026-09-29); we ran no benchmark, used no third-party benchmarks and took no vendor payments.
Ist n8n besser als Make? Die kurze Antwort
n8n and Make both build multi-step automations visually, connect to many apps and support AI agents and MCP. Pick n8n if you have technical staff, want to self-host, or want billing per workflow execution with unlimited users and workflows. Pick Make if you want a no-code builder with a free plan that has no time limit and paid plans from $9/month. Note that n8n prices were only shown in EUR, so a direct dollar comparison is not confirmed.
Based on our verified profiles of n8n (checked 2026-10-01) and Make (checked 2026-09-29); n8n prices were displayed in EUR and no benchmark was run.
n8n oder Make: Was für welche Aufgabe passt
Wenn Sie nur die Antwort wollen, ist das die Tabelle. Alles darunter sind die Belege aus den beiden dokumentierten Profilen.
Direktvergleich
Sie möchten
Verwenden
Warum
Run automations on your own server
n8n
n8n offers a self-hosted Community Edition via Docker or npm; Make lists web and API only
Connect SaaS apps without writing code
Make
Make is a drag-and-drop scenario builder with 3,000+ apps
Write custom logic in JavaScript or Python
Either
n8n has code steps on all plans; Make has a Code app at 2 credits per second
Build AI agents
Either
n8n has AI Agent nodes; Make has AI Agents (beta) with an own-LLM-key option
Let AI apps trigger your automations
Either
n8n and Make both list MCP support
Try it free with no time limit
Make
Make Free has 1,000 credits per month with no time limit; n8n's cloud trial is 14 days
Run long multi-step workflows cheaply
n8n
n8n bills per workflow execution, not per step; Make uses one credit per module action
Set up SSO for the company
Either
n8n offers SSO, SAML and LDAP on Business; Make lists SSO on Enterprise
Run a scenario every minute
Make
Make paid plans have a 1-minute minimum interval; n8n schedules start at 5-minute intervals
Wer was wählen sollte
Pick n8n to self-host and bill per execution; pick Make for no-code building and a free plan
Wählen Sie n8n, wenn
You want to self-host: the Community Edition is free and runs on Docker or npm
You write code: n8n has JavaScript and Python code steps
You want billing per workflow execution rather than per step, with unlimited users and workflows on all plans
You are building AI agent workflows and have the technical skills to run them
Wählen Sie Make, wenn
You are not a developer and want a drag-and-drop scenario builder
You want a free plan with no time limit: 1,000 credits per month
You want a low entry price: Core is $9/month for 10k credits
You need many ready-made connections: Make lists 3,000+ apps
Was n8n besser kann und was Make besser kann
n8n
Self-hosting with a free Community Edition and unlimited users and workflows
Billing per workflow execution regardless of step count
JavaScript and Python code steps on all plans
Webhook and queue triggers, plus API and CLI control
Make
No-code drag-and-drop scenario builder
3,000+ app integrations
Building automations by prompt (Maia), drag-and-drop or MCP
Free plan with no time limit
n8n vs. Make Preise: Tarife und kostenlose Stufen
Direktvergleich
Tarif
Tool
Preis
Limits
n8n Community Edition
n8n
Free (self-hosted)
Unlimited workflow executions, users and workflows
2,500 (Starter), 10,000 (Pro), 40,000 (Business) executions per month
1,000 credits on Free; 10k credits shown for paid prices
Concurrency / interval
5 concurrent (Starter), up to 50 (Pro), 200+ (Business)
15-minute minimum interval on Free, 1 minute on paid
Context / file size
Not stated
Max file size 5MB on Free up to 1000MB on Enterprise
Seats / team
Unlimited users on all plans
Team roles and shared templates from Teams ($29/mo)
Funktionsvergleich
Direktvergleich
Funktion
n8n
Make
Visual builder
Yes
Yes
Code steps
Yes (JavaScript, Python)
Yes (Code app, JavaScript or Python)
AI agents
Yes (AI Agent nodes)
Yes (beta)
MCP support
Yes
Yes (MCP server)
Self-hosting
Yes (Docker, npm)
Not stated
API
Yes, on all plans
Yes, from Core; not on Free
Mobile and desktop apps
No desktop or mobile apps seen
No desktop or mobile apps seen
Datenschutz und Datentraining
Direktvergleich
n8n
Make
Training on your data
Not used to train n8n or third-party ML models
Not stated
Retention
Execution history 7 to 365+ days by plan
Execution logs 7 days Free, 30 days Core to Teams, 60 days Enterprise
Business controls
Encrypted credential store, audit logging, 2FA enforcement (Enterprise), DPA available
2FA, SSO (Enterprise), audit logs, hosting on AWS (EU/North America)
Entnommen aus den veröffentlichten Richtlinienseiten des jeweiligen Anbieters zum Zeitpunkt unserer Prüfung. Richtlinien ändern sich; die Quellenlinks stehen unten.
Wechsel zwischen n8n und Make: was mitgenommen wird
n8n → MakeWird übernommen
Multi-step app automations rebuilt as scenarios
AI agent and MCP use cases
Webhook-style triggers and API use
Sie verlieren
Self-hosting option
Per-execution billing (Make charges a credit per module action)
Make → n8nWird übernommen
Multi-step app automations rebuilt as workflows
AI agent and MCP use cases
Code steps in JavaScript or Python
Sie verlieren
Make's 3,000+ app count (n8n lists 1000+)
Free plan with no time limit (n8n cloud has a trial)
Vor- und Nachteile
n8n
Free self-hosted Community Edition
Billing per workflow execution, not per step
Unlimited users and workflows on all plans
Cloud plans capped by monthly executions (2.5K on Starter)
Business plan is self-hosted only
Self-hosting requires technical expertise
Make
Free plan with no time limit (1,000 credits/month)
Not a developer and want drag-and-drop? Choose Make.
Workflows with many steps? n8n bills per execution, Make bills per module action.
Want to stay free with no time limit? Make Free has no time limit; n8n's free route is self-hosting.
Need a confirmed dollar price? Make lists USD; n8n was shown in EUR only.
Technical team with high volume: n8n. Non-technical team connecting SaaS apps: Make.
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Is n8n or Make cheaper for automation?
n8n is cheapest when self-hosted; a cloud dollar comparison with Make is not confirmed. n8n has a free self-hosted Community Edition, and its cloud Starter plan was shown at 20€/mo in EUR only. Make has a free plan and paid plans from $9/month for 10k credits. We could not confirm n8n USD pricing.
Can I self-host n8n and Make?
You can self-host n8n using Docker or npm. Self-hosting needs technical expertise. Our Make profile lists web and API access and does not list a self-hosted option.
How do n8n and Make bill usage?
n8n charges per full workflow execution, not per step. Make uses credits, and every module action consumes one, so long scenarios use more of your allowance.
Which is better for non-developers, n8n or Make?
Make is positioned for non-developers, with a drag-and-drop scenario builder. n8n is aimed at developers and technical teams, though it also has a visual workflow editor.